f inspect xfail

Summary

The reason for the xfailed tests were enhanced with the issue numbers of newly created issues. A xfail which was not necessary anymore was removed.

See #30 (closed) , #51 (closed) and #52 (closed)

Check List for the Author

Please, prepare your MR for a review. Be sure to write a summary and a focus and create gitlab comments for the reviewer. They should guide the reviewer through the changes, explain your changes and also point out open questions. For further good practices have a look at our review guidelines

• All automated tests pass
• Reference related Issues
• Up-to-date CHANGELOG.md
• Annotations in code (Gitlab comments)
  • Intent of new code
  • Problems with old code
  • Why this implementation?

Check List for the Reviewer

• I understand the intent of this MR
• All automated tests pass
• Up-to-date CHANGELOG.md
• The test environment setup works and the intended behavior is reproducible in the test environment
• In-code documentation and comments are up-to-date.
• Check: Are there spezifications? Are they satisfied?

For further good practices have a look at our review guidelines.

unittests/test_data_model.py

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ class DataModelTest(unittest.TestCase):
         assert "testproperty" in names
 
     # TODO this seems to require integration test
-    @pytest.mark.xfail
+    @pytest.mark.xfail(reason="This test will need an integration test. See issue #51")
     def test_get_existing_entities(self):
         db.RecordType(name="TestRecord").insert()
         c = db.Container().extend([