Improving the compare_entities functions
Summary
I reviewed the compare_entities function from apiutils and identified some problematic cases (e.g. multi-properties). Corresponding unit tests have been created and the functionality repaired.
This is a preparation for a comprehensive review of the merge_entities function. I think it's a good idea to merge this in a first step as it's probably independent from the review of the merge function.
Focus
This one can probably be reviewed line-by-line. Maybe look for missing test-corner-cases that might be needed. The code for checking the value for equality is still not ideal, but I think a more comprehensive review (also adding the recursive reference checker) should be postponed.
Test Environment
There are unit tests.
Check List for the Author
Please, prepare your MR for a review. Be sure to write a summary and a focus and create gitlab comments for the reviewer. They should guide the reviewer through the changes, explain your changes and also point out open questions. For further good practices have a look at our review guidelines
-
All automated tests pass -
Reference related issues -
Up-to-date CHANGELOG.md (or not necessary) -
Up-to-date JSON schema (or not necessary) -
Appropriate user and developer documentation (or not necessary) - How do I use the software? Assume "stupid" users.
- How do I develop or debug the software? Assume novice developers.
-
Annotations in code (Gitlab comments) - Intent of new code
- Problems with old code
- Why this implementation?
Check List for the Reviewer
-
I understand the intent of this MR -
All automated tests pass -
Up-to-date CHANGELOG.md (or not necessary) -
Appropriate user and developer documentation (or not necessary) -
The test environment setup works and the intended behavior is reproducible in the test environment -
In-code documentation and comments are up-to-date. -
Check: Are there specifications? Are they satisfied?
For further good practices have a look at our review guidelines.
Merge request reports
Activity
requested review from @henrik
assigned to @salexan
mentioned in issue #164 (closed)
added 6 commits
-
4ebec82b...08a4e13f - 5 commits from branch
dev
- a9c09d73 - Merge branch 'dev' into f-check-merge-entities
-
4ebec82b...08a4e13f - 5 commits from branch
enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 46709d59 succeeds
enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 3515d1da succeeds
mentioned in commit 5ce8e910
mentioned in commit f4e2aff0
mentioned in merge request !106