This reverts commit 63c8db1f.

Warning: may cause an infinite loop with output in one server thread.

Warning: may cause an infinite loop with output in one server thread.

Tests for quotes around datetimes

# Summary

Adds a test for checking queries with quoted datetimes. See [#39](https://gitlab.com/caosdb/caosdb-server/-/issues/39) in caosdb-server.

# Focus

`test_issue_39` in `tests/test_issues_server.py` 

# Test Environment

Use an empty profile with server set to `f-quotes-around-datetimes` manually in `profile.yml`.

# Check List for the Author

Please, prepare your MR for a review. Be sure to write a summary and a
focus and create gitlab comments for the reviewer. They should guide the
reviewer through the changes, explain your changes and also point out open
questions. For further good practices have a look at [our review
guidelines](https://gitlab.com/caosdb/caosdb/-/blob/dev/REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md)

- [x] All automated tests pass
- [x] Reference related Issues
- [x] Up-to-date CHANGELOG.md
- [x] Annotations in code (Gitlab comments)
  - Intent of new code
  - Problems with old code
  - Why this implementation?


# Check List for the Reviewer


- [x] I understand the intent of this MR
- [ ] All automated tests pass
- [x] Up-to-date CHANGELOG.md
- [ ] The test environment setup works and the intended behavior is
  reproducible in the test environment
- [ ] In-code documentation and comments are up-to-date.
- [ ] Check: Are there spezifications? Are they satisfied?

For further good practices have a look at [our review guidelines](https://gitlab.com/caosdb/caosdb/-/blob/dev/REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md).

See merge request caosdb/caosdb-pyinttest!32

# Summary

Adds a test for checking queries with quoted datetimes. See [#39](https://gitlab.com/caosdb/caosdb-server/-/issues/39) in caosdb-server.

# Focus

`test_issue_39` in `tests/test_issues_server.py`

versioning

See merge request caosdb/caosdb-pyinttest!26

Fix and update test_recursive_parents

Closes #12

See merge request caosdb/caosdb-pyinttest!37

f-select-subproperties -> dev

# Summary

See summary of https://gitlab.com/caosdb/caosdb-webui/-/merge_requests/72

# Focus

See new tests in `tests/test_select.py`. Also I did some refactoring and removed the deprecated nose functions.

# Check List for the Author

Please, prepare your MR for a review. Be sure to write a summary and a
focus and create gitlab comments for the reviewer. They should guide the
reviewer through the changes, explain your changes and also point out open
questions. For further good practices have a look at [our review
guidelines](https://gitlab.com/caosdb/caosdb/-/blob/dev/REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md)

- [x] All automated tests pass
- [x] Reference related Issues
- [x] Up-to-date CHANGELOG.md
- [x] Annotations in code (Gitlab comments)
  - Intent of new code
  - Problems with old code
  - Why this implementation?


# Check List for the Reviewer


- [x] I understand the intent of this MR
- [ ] All automated tests pass
- [x] Up-to-date CHANGELOG.md
- [x] The test environment setup works and the intended behavior is
  reproducible in the test environment
- [x] In-code documentation and comments are up-to-date.
- [ ] Check: Are there spezifications? Are they satisfied?

For further good practices have a look at [our review guidelines](https://gitlab.com/caosdb/caosdb/-/blob/dev/REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md).

See merge request caosdb/caosdb-pyinttest!34

f-one-time-tokens -> dev

# Summary

One-time tokens are access tokens which can be used to authenticate and authorize a caosdb client. One-time tokens can be used once to sign in and create a session token for further communication with the server. After that they expire immediately. However, the one-time token if they are not used before a particular date they expire even before anyone has used them at all. Thus, one-time tokens work as if they were one-time passwords with the additional feature that they can specify a set of roles and explicit permissions of the resulting session.

One-time tokens have two major use-cases. The first is the authentication and authorization of sessions by clients (e.g. crawler). They can read out a one-time token that is being written to a file by the server. The authentication token can be fed into the `configure_connection` function of the pylib and the client can authenticate without a password.

The other one is the authentication and authorization of server-side scripts which are triggered by a user who does not necessarily have the permissions that the script needs for it's work. E.g the anonymous user is allowed to use scripts that need some specific update permissions. Effectively, one-time tokens can be used to promote a caller of a server-side script from a unprivileged client to a client with more permissions (for this one session). However, the script calling is encapsulated in such a way, that only the script runs with these promoted permissions. The caller does not gain any more permissions apart from that.

This MR also depends on https://gitlab.com/caosdb/caosdb-server/-/merge_requests/40 and https://gitlab.com/caosdb/caosdb-pylib/-/merge_requests/28

# Focus

The focus should be the new tests in `test_adminstration` which test the usage of one-time tokens in the client (1. use-case) and the new tests in `test_server_side_scripting` which test calling a server-side script as unprivileged user (2. use-case). 

# Test Environment

Just check the pipeline. You will notice, that the server-side scripting tests fail. However, that is due to a missing/wrong pycaosdb.ini in the home directory of the server-side scripting. Relevant for this MR is that the server-side scripts have been called with the correct authtoken, which seems to be the case.

# Check List for the Author

Please, prepare your MR for a review. Be sure to write a summary and a
focus and create gitlab comments for the reviewer. They should guide the
reviewer through the changes, explain your changes and also point out open
questions. For further good practices have a look at [our review
guidelines](https://gitlab.com/caosdb/caosdb/-/blob/dev/REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md)

- [x] All automated tests pass
- [x] Reference related Issues
- [x] Up-to-date CHANGELOG.md
- [x] Annotations in code (Gitlab comments)
  - Intent of new code
  - Problems with old code
  - Why this implementation?


# Check List for the Reviewer


- [x] I understand the intent of this MR
- [ ] All automated tests pass
- [x] Up-to-date CHANGELOG.md
- [x] The test environment setup works and the intended behavior is
  reproducible in the test environment
- [x] In-code documentation and comments are up-to-date.
- [x] Check: Are there spezifications? Are they satisfied?

For further good practices have a look at [our review guidelines](https://gitlab.com/caosdb/caosdb/-/blob/dev/REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md).

See merge request caosdb/caosdb-pyinttest!29

This reverts commit 3e3d405c.

Sorry, wrong branch!

f-name-query -> dev

See merge request caosdb/caosdb-pyinttest!28

Server 62 renaming

See merge request caosdb/caosdb-pyinttest!27