Test to confirm (or reject) #71

Summary

See #71 (moved) .

Test was added. Described functionality seems to work perfectly.

Check List for the Author

Please, prepare your MR for a review. Be sure to write a summary and a focus and create gitlab comments for the reviewer. They should guide the reviewer through the changes, explain your changes and also point out open questions. For further good practices have a look at our review guidelines

• All automated tests pass
• Reference related issues
• Up-to-date CHANGELOG.md (or not necessary)
• Up-to-date JSON schema (or not necessary)
• Appropriate user and developer documentation (or not necessary)
  • How do I use the software? Assume "stupid" users.
  • How do I develop or debug the software? Assume novice developers.
• Annotations in code (Gitlab comments)
  • Intent of new code
  • Problems with old code
  • Why this implementation?

Check List for the Reviewer

• I understand the intent of this MR
• All automated tests pass
• Up-to-date CHANGELOG.md (or not necessary)
• Appropriate user and developer documentation (or not necessary)
• The test environment setup works and the intended behavior is reproducible in the test environment
• In-code documentation and comments are up-to-date.
• Check: Are there specifications? Are they satisfied?

For further good practices have a look at our review guidelines.

unittests/test_yaml_model_parser.py

@@ -641,3 +641,21 @@ RT2:
 </RecordType>
 , 'bar': <RecordType name="bar"/>
 }"""
+
+
+def test_setting_values():
+  model = parse_model_from_string("""
+parameter:
+  datatype: INTEGER
+
+Simulation:
+  role: Record
+  obligatory_properties:
+    parameter: 26
+""")
+
+  assert len(model) == 2
+  assert str(model["parameter"])[:-1] == '<Property name="parameter" datatype="INTEGER"/>'
+  assert model["Simulation"].role == "Record"
+  assert model["Simulation"].name == "Simulation"
+  assert model["Simulation"].get_property("parameter").value == 26