Test to confirm (or reject) #71

Summary

See #71 (moved) .

Test was added. Described functionality seems to work perfectly.

Check List for the Author

Please, prepare your MR for a review. Be sure to write a summary and a focus and create gitlab comments for the reviewer. They should guide the reviewer through the changes, explain your changes and also point out open questions. For further good practices have a look at our review guidelines

• All automated tests pass
• Reference related issues
• Up-to-date CHANGELOG.md (or not necessary)
• Up-to-date JSON schema (or not necessary)
• Appropriate user and developer documentation (or not necessary)
  • How do I use the software? Assume "stupid" users.
  • How do I develop or debug the software? Assume novice developers.
• Annotations in code (Gitlab comments)
  • Intent of new code
  • Problems with old code
  • Why this implementation?

Check List for the Reviewer

• I understand the intent of this MR
• All automated tests pass
• Up-to-date CHANGELOG.md (or not necessary)
• Appropriate user and developer documentation (or not necessary)
• The test environment setup works and the intended behavior is reproducible in the test environment
• In-code documentation and comments are up-to-date.
• Check: Are there specifications? Are they satisfied?

For further good practices have a look at our review guidelines.

unittests/test_yaml_model_parser.py

@@ -664,42 +664,3 @@ def test_setting_values():
     assert model["Simulation"].name == "Simulation"
     assert model["Simulation"].get_property("parameter").value == 26
 
-
-def test_sync_output(capfd):
-    model = parse_model_from_string("""
-RT:
-  obligatory_properties:
-    identifier:
-      datatype: TEXT
-""")
-
-    existing_entities = [db.RecordType(name="RT", id=25).add_property(name="identifier",
-                                                                      datatype="INTEGER",
-                                                                      importance="OBLIGATORY",
-                                                                      id=24),
-                         db.Property(name="identifier", datatype="INTEGER", id=24)]
-
-    def get_existing_entities(ent_cont):
-        return existing_entities
-
-    class MockQuery:
-        def __init__(self, q):
-            self.q = q
-
-        def execute(self, unique=True):
-            id = int(self.q.split("=")[1])
-            for existing_ent in existing_entities:
-                if existing_ent.id == id:
-                    return existing_ent
-            return None
-
-    model.get_existing_entities = get_existing_entities
-    caosadvancedtools.models.parser.db.Query = MockQuery
-    caosadvancedtools.models.parser.db.Container.update = Mock()
-
-    model.sync_data_model(True, True)
-    assert caosadvancedtools.models.parser.db.Container.update.called
-    output, err = capfd.readouterr()
-    print(output)
-    assert "version from the yaml file: TEXT" in output
-    assert "version from LinkAhead: INTEGER" in output